Showing posts with label football. Show all posts
Showing posts with label football. Show all posts

Sunday, May 15, 2011

John Carlin, about anti-FC Barcelona campaign

"Alex Ferguson, Manchester United, has the complexity of a shark, be genetically programmed to smell blood and kill you, if it stops moving, it dies. The Scot is 69 and has nearly 25 ahead of United, when he has won 12 league titles, the last yesterday, and two European Cups.

Unlike Pep Guardiola, a 40-year jovencillo whose faces Barcelona in a couple of weeks in other major European final, Ferguson does not give the slightest sign of physical or mental exhaustion. Guardiola, more recognizably human, it takes only three years as coach of the Catalan club he grew up, but talk of surrender, to seek a life plan that gives you less likely to succumb to a nervous breakdown.

Ferguson lives with pressure as the shark in the sea water. And he draws on everything that smacks of weakness in his opponent. His dilemma is that, within the field, in Barcelona there is no weak spots. Guardiola will be an individual vulnerable and complicated, but has built a bulletproof team with offensive persistence waves.

Weaknesses off the pitch but Barcelona does have, specifically in the field of propaganda, which is now severely harassed. Ferguson knows this and not spurn the opportunity that has fallen from the sky or, rather, from Madrid to mount a verbal campaign designed to tarnish the image that has been wrought beatific Barca to undermine the morale of Guardiola and his players .

Of what they boast in Barcelona, ​​and rightly, is to have created a team capable of winning something even more difficult for a European Cup, the world's admiration. But in England, as media influence the mental processes of the planet is huge football fans (especially now that the Champions League final will be played at Wembley), has begun to doubt the boat from what happened during the bloody series party just play with Real Madrid. There are two cardinal sins in English football: the teatrismo and racism. And the idea that stalled is that the club is guilty of both.

Everything would have stayed a couple of stories had it not been for the most brilliant move made by the Madrid during the war of 18 days, developed not in the mind of the coach or the players' feet, but in the offices of Bernabéu. When executives decided to come into play Barça his complaint to José Mourinho, the coach of Madrid, in the UEFA, Real Madrid responded with a deadly counterattack. Launched another complaint that accused the players of Barcelona-specifically, Busquets, Pedro Alves and simulating lesions in order to influence rogue so in arbitration decisions. And not without reason. Busquets is facing the possibility of a brilliant career in Hollywood, but why, why, is forced to start casting before the end of his playing career?

As for the charge of racism against the same Busquets, whose origin was video footage released by the Madrid, there has operated with blatant cynicism. Maybe it's the UEFA and Madrid itself, in fact, the sin of racism that are assuming that Busquets called "mono" Real Madrid defender Marcelo due to the color of their skin. He could have said the same to Ramos, who probably threw worst insults, or I could say Rooney at Wembley without causing the slightest disturbance.

But never mind. The same propaganda is fed to the truth than lies. The fact that the hero of the year in Barcelona (and dear friend, it is assumed, Busquets) is Abidal, a Frenchman of pure African blood, will not stop the train. And Ferguson is mounted on it. Lo teatrismo, in particular, will not waste a bullet. Because when the indefatigable Scottish smell blood, no force on earth or sea to stop you.
"

JOHN CARLIN 15/05/2011, El País.
Translation with Google Translate (Don't kill the Messenger).

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

FC Barcelona - Arsenal

[Translated with Google Translate]




After the first assault in England, the British media criticized the press from Barcelona for accusing the referee to decide the match (although there is more than convincing evidence). These media were claiming that the Barcelona press had to admit that Arsenal had deserved to win the game.

It's funny now how the same media claim that the Arsenal was robbed in Barcelona. The most significant is that no one denies that according the rules if the player continues playing, after the referee's whistle, is worthy of a yellow card. The arguments to defend the theory of the "Persicution" suffered by Arsenal (according to The Sun) are surreal; "showing him a second yellow for shooting at goal just ONE second after the match official blew for offside." (sic) or the excuse given by Van Persie himself: he had not heard the whistle. That is, the argument of those who accuse the referee of robbing the Arsenal, is not that the card was not according the rules, but "that the referee could have forgiven the player" (strange argument for a defense, right?).

The key question is that according to the rules of this action is penalized with a yellow card. The only reason is to avoid the players loosing time. And no one can deny that Arsenal lost a lot of time. In fact, the added time of all the match was nine minutes! (5+4 minutes). Yet another factor, if Van Persie had been a model of fair play perhaps the referee wouldn't have shown his second yellow, but the Dutch had done exactly the opposite: during the first part had already merited the "orange" card with his participation in the brawl and the following push on Alves. In fact, we recalled the worst World Cup Van Persie.

The British press also forget about the ignored penalty over Messi. This "small" detail does not seem important, although it would have meant the end of the first half with 2-0.

They neglect the strictly sporting of merits. Even before the expulsion, the ball was at 75% to 25% for Barcelona. Also, Arsenal had not done anything during the game, aside from defending. They were fortunate that, at their only arrival on Barcelona's area, a player of Barcelona (Busquets) scored the goal.

Arsenal went to Barcelona to play catenaccio. But if it is sad to fail with your own ideas, to fail with those of others is pathetic. Arsenal held out his version of catenaccio for forty minutes, but eventually, collapsed. They tried to imitate the Inter Milan and failed, which was fairly predictable. Did they really expect to survive in the Nou Camp playing as an Italian team?