What if the Cologne attacks were not carried out my refugees...

We talked about the counterbalancing of the negative effects on public opinion of the NYE's sex attacks scandal by mass media. In the article from Financial Times that we mentioned, "Women and children refugee numbers crossing into Europe surge", it is told that only 3 of the 58 suspects of the NYE's sex attacks in Cologne were refugees. Like if that made anything better.

As I wrote in January: "Although finally it was admitted that mostly refugees had taken part in the attacks, in the beginning, that much was denied. Like if the possibility that the attacks were committed by previous migrants and not refugees was better... It is better for those, like Merkel, who have opened the doors of Europe to muslims, but not for the common citizens." Now they tell us again they were not refugees.

That shows how silly they think common readers are. So they are not new migrants, they are "old" ones, "locals"... What's the idea that they are trying to sell us? "Don't worry about more refugees coming, we are already fucked up"?

If they were not refugees, how came there were a thousand men celebrating New Year's Eve alone? Where were their wifes and girlfriends? Because some of them must have wifes or girlfriends... They had to be at home. How can this be? Because that's what women do in Islam; stay at home.

And as I wrote in the same article in January: "One way or the other, one truth stands: the rights of women in muslim societies, are worth nothing. One could argue "They are not muslims, they were drinking and partying", yet they come from Muslim countries, and Islam and women rights are just not compatible; just like Islam and democracy are not compatible."

Counterbalancing the Rapefugees Scandal

In the last days we have had several examples of how mass media are trying to counterbalance the bad effect on public opinions that had the leaking (because they tried to hide them) of the New Year's Eve sex attacks.

Two examples:

"Women and children refugee numbers crossing into Europe surge" ("they have accounted for just 45 per cent so far this year", the article was published the 20th of January... So less than one month of data!)

"10,000 refugee children are missing, says Europol"

If you needed a prove of the mass media manipulating the public opinion, here you have it.


But what I wanted to take a look at, is the inmigrant sex ratio, mentioned in the first article:

		Only adults
Men .....................	73%	................ 86,90%
Women ................	11%	................ 13,10%
Children ..............	16%

Why 86,90% of the refugees were males? Of course they can say that it is a very dangerous journey and that's why men take the risk alone... But that contradicts the official theory: aren't we told that refugees are fleeing from destruction and a certain death in Syria? If that is true, how can these men live their families there to look for a better life. If they are fleeing from war and death, it doesn't make sense the theory that they pretend to bring their families to Europe later, because it could be already too late.

If it was me, I would surely never leave my wife and children in such situation, if it was a matter of life and death, as we are told.

Or maybe just not all the refugees fleeing from war and destruction...?