Showing posts with label moral. Show all posts
Showing posts with label moral. Show all posts

Monday, May 8, 2017

BLUE WHALE

First of all, let's see what Wikipedia says about Blue Whale, for those who haven't heard about this wrongly-called "game":

"The term Blue Whale game refers to a trend on Russian-speaking social media, linked to a possible increase in child and teenage suicides, though no suicides have been definitively linked to the game. There have been photos of self-cutting wounds shared on social media alongside the game's hashtags. The game is based in the relationship between the challengers (also called players or participants) and the administrators.[ It involves a series of duties given by the administrators that players must complete, usually one per day, some of which involve self-mutilation. Some tasks can be given in advance, while others can be passed on by the administrators on the day, the last task being suicide. It is believed that the first case of suicide related to the game occurred in 2015 in Russia."

One wonders how is this possible? Who can create such horrible "game", and even more difficult to understand, who would want to play it?!

I have been thinking about it. And my main conclusion is that it is the symptom of the biggest problems of our society: the destruction of moral values.

Is this process "an accident", or has it been carried (and it is being carried) on purpose? Personally I believe it is the latter, but this is not the point of this post. I want to identify some of the mechanisms by which the destruccion of moral values is done:

- Destruction of family. Family is the first and usually the strongest support of the individual. The destruction of family is the first step in the isolation of the individual.

- Reduction of the duration of childhood. This was already denounced by Neil Postman in 1982: "In perhaps his most provocative book, The Disappearance of Childhood, Postman attempts to explain why the dividing line between childhood and adulthood is rapidly eroding in contemporary society, and why the social role of the child may well disappear in modern industrial society."

- Teenagerization. Adults become more and more selfish, egoistic and unable to cope with frustration.

- Individualism.

- De-christianization. GK Chesterton is often quoted as saying "When a man ceases to believe in God, he doesn't believe in nothing. He believes in anything."

Although this quote is difficult to trace, several other observations by GK Chesterton make the same point:
"You hard-shelled materialists were all balanced on the very edge of belief — of belief in almost anything." [GK Chesterton, "The Miracle of Moon Crescent" (1924)]

"The nineteenth century decided to have no religious authority. The twentieth century seems disposed to have any religious authority." [GK Chesterton, Illustrated London News, April 26, 1924]

But my favorite is the following one, that explains why all the previous points make sense, why somebody would want to destroy the moral values of our society:

"A man who refuses to have his own philosophy will only have the used-up scraps of somebody else's philosophy." [GK Chesterton, "The Revival of Philosophy," The Common Man (1930)]

Why Russia?

One question that arises is why did this phenomen begin in Russia? The main reason is the moral catastrophe that the Yeltsin (*) Era brought to Russia. The consequences of the collapse of the Soviet Union and Yeltsin's presidency expanded like waves in the water across Russia. That period of "freedom", ultracapitalism, individualism, hedonism had many, if not all, the elements described above. Putin's nowadays support is, partly, the people's reaction to that period. In opposition to that period of surrender to foreign powers, and absence of moral or national values, Putin's presidency has placed the Orthodox Church in a predominant position, and uses any opportunity to organize events to remember and honor the successes and sacrifices of ancestors (as it is perfectly shown by the annual Victory's Day celebrations).

(*) Important to remember the support that Yeltsin had from Western powers, elites and politicians.

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Si Deu no existeix, tot està permés



Sovint es discuteix sobre si Dostoievski va dir o no "Si Deu no existeix, tot està permés". La resposata és sí i no. No ho va dir ell directament, sinó mitjançant un personatge d'una de les seves novel·les, Ivan Karamazov, a Els germans Karamazov, la seva novel·la més personal. Però coneixent una mica la seva obra podem concloure que és una màxima que segurament ell compartia.

La idea és ben senzilla, si Deu no existeix, l'esser humà no és més que qualsevol altra espècie animal, no més que un gos o un cargol (per posar dos exemples, però també es podrien citar les rates i les hienes...). I si l'home és un animal més, la moral no té sentit, doncs els animals només es regeixen pels instints, principalment l'instint de supervivència.

La resposta dels ateus serà que sí existeix el Bè i el Mal sense Deu, doncs la moral o la ètica, com vulguem anomenar-ho són dins de nosaltres; no provenen de Deu. Però cal recordar que el que per nosaltres són el Bè i el Mal, els nostres valors, no tenen perque ser compartits per la resta de la humanitat; alguns exemples: els sacrifis humans de les societats pre-hispàniques d'Amèrica, l'ablació de clitoris en certes regions d'Àfrica, la poligamia entre mormons, les bodes acordades amb o entre menors... Tindriem tants exemples com vulguessim, d'actes que a nosaltres ens semblen reprobables que altres religions, societats o cultures consideren normals; és més ho consideren el Bè.

És més, els nostres valors segueixen essent cristians, tot i que neguem el seu origen, perque "sota la capa finíssima de la visibilitat pública continuen les mateixes lògiques que, de gairebé vint segles ençà , impregnen fonamentalment el funcionament de la societat europea....".

Per tant, la creença en Deu és la base necessària (tot i que no suficient) per l'existència de la moral. Sense Deu, qualsevol moral és una farsa; o les restes del substrat cristià del que Europa (malgrat els intents d'alguns) encara no s'ha desfet.